My first draft drummed up great feedback and ideas. Thanks to all who’ve contributed. Here’s the second draft.
I. Introduction
HopeCommunity Church has learned that a new teaching is finding a foothold in some Christian Reformed Churches. We believe this teaching, called Kinism, is heretical based upon our examination of Scripture, the confessions, and previous acts of Synod.
Kinism is a recent grassroots theological movement within the broader Reformed community. Like other grassroots movements, Kinism claims no single organization or leader. It has no well-known or published works. It lives on the internet through various blogs and a now-defunct scholarly journal.
No one leader or organization dogmatically defines Kinism. What follows is a summary of Kinist beliefs found on Kinist websites.
- Race is defined as common patrilineal descent and is the sum of inheritable traits held in common with near and distant relatives.
- Culture is an external expression of religious belief combined with race and the location of a people group.
- A nation is made up of a single race and culture sharing a single language under a single civil government. Kinists call this kind of nation a religio-ethnostate.The only responsibility Christians have to those of other faiths is to share the gospel.
- God forbade interracial, inter-religious marriage in the Old Testament and carried that prohibition forward into the New Testament church. Interracial marriage is considered unequal yoking and destructive to society.
- Those seeking to establish a New World Order use multiculturalism, interracial marriage, and transracial adoption to destroy God-given diversity.
- Europe is the historic seat of Christendom. The New World Order wants to Christendom which was established by white males. Therefore, the white male is especially under attack by the forces of the New World Order.
- Envy of “their superiors” motivates minorities. Therefore minorities must be separated from their (presumably) white superiors.
- Christians’ spheres of responsibility are family, race, town, state, region, and country. “…Christians should favor the native and the normal over the alien and the novel.”
- Adoption should be rare and transracial/international adoptions should prohibited.
Kinism finds its home among confessional, Reformed churches. Kinists rightly affirm the following:
- The Triune God glorifies himself through a beautiful, diverse creation.
- God made humanity in his image.
- Humanity, without regard to race, is fallen in sin is by nature under God’s wrath for transgressing his just and righteous law.
- Humanity, because of our sin, is incapable of salvation outside God’s grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. Salvation is for the glory of God alone.
- God has revealed all this to his chosen people, the church, through the Scriptures by the power of the Holy Spirit.
- God has gathered his chosen into the body of Christ, the church, which is a community of faith called to minister to one another and the world through sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Kinism blends orthodox Reformed theology with an ethnocentric hermeneutic resulting in the affirmations above.
Kinism, as defined through Kinist websites and preachers, is antithetical to a lived gospel in God’s diverse world. Different Christians will object to various points in Kinist theology. However, the job of the church isn’t to evaluate the existence or absence of a New World Order, the likelihood of one world government, or other items in the Kinist agenda. The church is the body of Christ, which judges all theological claims in light of Scripture and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, while there may be much to object to coming from the Kinist camp, this overture will only address those items which are in blatant violation of Scripture’s clear teaching and the Reformed worldview as expressed in our historic creeds, confessions, contemporary testimony, and acts of Synod. On those grounds, we object to the following points of Kinist theology:
- Interracial marriage is contrary to God’s plan.
- God has ordained separation in a religio-ethnostate which necessitates racial separation in all areas of life.
II. Why Should Synod Address Kinism?
Giventhat Kinism is a minority view within the broader Reformed community, some may wonder why Synod should address the problem? There are at least five reasons Synod should address this issue rather than shrug it off as a minor disturbance in the broader Reformed community.
- A single pastor within the Christian Reformed Church has propagated Kinism in his teaching, preaching, and online writings. For years, he was able to teach Kinism as a pastor of the CRCNA, which necessarily associates our denomination with this heresy. This pastor was allowed to continue in error because his supervising council and classis were theologically ill-equipped to respond. We understand that he would have likely been able to continue in his heresy had he not made blatantly racist, sexist, and anti-Semitic statements on social media which exposed the core of his Kinist beliefs. Finally, after years of complaints to this pastor’s elders and classes which did nothing to curtail his teaching, the pastor left the CRCNA and took his congregation with him after being exposed on social media.
- Kinism could very well be a pervasive theology within the CRCNA. Was this one pastor the only officebearer in the CRCNA who is a Kinist? We certainly hope so, but we simply don’t know. Perhaps he was just the loudest voice of Kinism in our denomination. Synod should declare loudly for all officebearers to hear – Kinism will not be tolerated in our church!
- While the CRCNA did amazing work in the 1970s, ‘80s, and ‘90s to refute the heresy of Apartheid in South Africa, many current CRCNA officebearers and members are unfamiliar with their work. There is nothing entirely new in this overture. The theological arguments of Kinism are indistinguishable from those of Apartheid theologians. Kinism is simply Apartheid by another name. Yet, elders and classes in the CRCNA were unable to deal with Kinism in their midst due to ignorance of past decisions by the CRCNA.
- Given the current political climate in North America surrounding race, the CRCNA would be wise to reiterate unequivocally our Biblically and confessionally informed denunciation of Apartheid. The church must proclaim to the world our love of neighbor without regard to race.
- Our hope with this overture is to give officebearers and classes the appropriate theological knowledge to refute Kinism and confront any officebearer who may propagate Kinist theology.
III. Familial Relations – Kinist Claims
Kinistsclaim the following:
- “That those seeking a New World Order find the boundless diversity in God’s creation an intolerable hindrance to earthly unity. That they seek a one-world government, a one-world religion, and a one-world man. That multiculturalism, miscegenation, and transracial adoption are all means to their ends.”
- “That the God of the Old Testament, who forbade interracial, interreligious marriages to His covenant nation, is the same as the God of the New Testament. That marriage between parties who are not naturally congenial is unequal yoking. That unequal yoking in marriage or in society at large is destructive of Christian harmony, association, and growth.”[1]
IV. Familial Relations – Scriptural Problems
Paul wrote to the Colossians about division in within the body of Christ. He addressed them as those who “…have been raised with Christ…”[2] and then went on to admonish them against sin that would harm their interpersonal relations. “You used to walk in these ways, in the life you once lived. 8 But now you must rid yourselves of all such things as these: anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language from your lips. 9 Do not lie to each other, since you have taken off your old self with its practices10 and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge in the image of its Creator.”[3]
The church in Colossae was raised with Christ. They had put off the old self with its practices and put on a new self. Paul then draws the logical conclusion of this real spiritual change in the church. “Here there is no Greek or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. 12 Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.”[4]God removed the wall of division between Jew and Gentile. All people within the church constitutes a people. God’s chosen peoplewas no longer merely a rough sketch of ethnic Israel, but all people who have been raised in Christ and put off the old self with its practices.
Peter concurs with Paul. “But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.”[5]Peter, as a zealous Jew, could not be more explicit: God’s people are one nation.
The church, which constitutes a single people, is then free to operate as one people. There isn’t the slightest hint of maintaining old ethnic differences between people in God’s one nation. Kinists downplay the real change that God has effected through his saving grace, insisting that while we may constitute one church, we are in fact a separate people.
Marriage is the most intimate of relationships and mirrors the church’s relationship with God. Paul told the ethnically diverse church in Ephesus, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.”[6]
Paul draws a parallel between the relationship of Christ to his church with the marriage relationship between a man and a woman. Christ is analogous to the husband in the marriage relationship. Christ loved the church to the point of dying for the church, which includes people from every nation. Christ does not marry many wives, each one constituting a separate nation. Rather, he marries one wife, the church, whose defining characteristic is her holy and blameless nature, not her skin color. Kinists claim to want to maintain God-given distinctions, yet they ignore the fact that Christ has done away with ethnic distinctions in the church through his marriage to a single bride.
Kinism claims that interracial marriages are forbidden by the God of the Old Testament and the New. We agree that God forbade marriages between the nation of Israel and other nations in the Old Testament. However, marriage between the nations was not prohibited upon the basis of race alone. Scripture clearly testifies that God’s primary concern in forbidding marriages in the Old Testament to the nations was not their ethnic background or skin color. Instead, the LORD wanted to keep his people free of the detestable practices of the nations. His concern was that they remain faithful to their covenant partner and not forsake him for the gods of the nations.
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you— 2 and when the LORD your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy. 3 Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, 4 for they will turn your sons away from following me to serve other gods, and the LORD’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you.[7]”
“After these things had been done, the leaders came to me and said, “The people of Israel, including the priests and the Levites, have not kept themselves separate from the neighboring peoples with their detestable practices, like those of the Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians and Amorites. 2 They have taken some of their daughters as wives for themselves and their sons, and have mingled the holy race with the peoples around them. And the leaders and officials have led the way in this unfaithfulness.”
3 When I heard this, I tore my tunic and cloak, pulled hair from my head and beard and sat down appalled. 4 Then everyone who trembled at the words of the God of Israel gathered around me because of this unfaithfulness of the exiles. And I sat there appalled until the evening sacrifice.”[8]
Between the Old Testament and New, we find a striking thematic unity. God warned his people in to avoid intermarriage between the nations based upon their detestable practicesin the Old Testament. In the New, the LORD reminds us that we are no longer a people with detestable practices. Those old people are dead. We, the church, are a new people. Continuing in Ezra we read,
“But now, O our God, what can we say after this? For we have disregarded the commands 11 you gave through your servants the prophets when you said: ‘The land you are entering to possess is a land polluted by the corruption of its peoples. By their detestable practices they have filled it with their impurity from one end to the other.”[9]
Scripture is clear – there is nothing intrinsically wrong with any particular race. The line of demarcation between Israel and the nations was not their lineage, but their covenant status with God. Israel was a covenant partner with God. The LORD was their God, and they were his people. The Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians and Amorites had no such relationship with God. Marriage between Israel and the nations caused God’s people to abandon their covenant with God. Therefore, Israel should not marry people from the nations.
God’s plan for his people was that they should marry others who are in covenant with God. This concern is echoed in the New Testament. Paul, writing to the ethnically diverse church in Corinth, did not mention national distinctions as he warned against unequal yoking. Rather, unequal yoking is a function of righteousness versus wickedness, light and darkness, Christ and Belial.
“Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15 What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said: “I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people.” 17 “Therefore come out from them and be separate, says the Lord. Touch no unclean thing, and I will receive you.” 18 “I will be a Father to you, and you will be my sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty.”[10]
Paulexplicitly prohibits unequal yoking with unbelievers. He calls the church to be separate from those in darkness who worship foreign gods. Paul doesn’t call the church to be separate from people of a different color or national origin. We, the church, are the temple of the living God, not separate temples, one for each nation, as Kinism would imply.
Biblical evidence against Kinism’s binding the Christian conscience by declaring marriage between different ethnicities sinful is clear. The CRC has recognized the Biblical case against prohibiting of men and women from different ethnicities marrying for decades.
V. Familial Relations – Confessional Problems
Our confessions and Contemporary Testimony recognize the radical unity we have in Christ.
“The church is the fellowship of those who confess Jesus as Lord. She is the bride of Christ, his chosen partner, loved by Jesus and loving him: delighting in his presence, seeking him in prayer— silent before the mystery of his love.”[11]
“We are the family of God, serving Christ together in Christian community. Single for a time or a life, devoted to the work of God, we offer our love and service to the building of the kingdom. Married, in relationships of lifelong loyalty, we offer our lives to the same work: building the kingdom, teaching and modeling the ways of the Lord so our children may know Jesus as Lord and learn to use their gifts in lives of joyful service. In friendship and family life, singleness and marriage, as parents and children, we reflect the covenant love of God.”[12]
The Heidelberg Catechism declares that our baptism incorporates us into God’s covenant people just as circumcision incorporated people into God’s Old Testament nation. “Q. Should infants also be baptized? A. Yes. Infants as well as adults are included in God’s covenant and people, and they, no less than adults, are promised deliverance from sin through Christ’s blood and the Holy Spirit who produces faith. Therefore, by baptism, the sign of the covenant, they too should be incorporated into the Christian church and distinguished from the children of unbelievers. This was done in the Old Testament by circumcision, which was replaced in the New Testament by baptism.”[13]
The Belgic Confession tells us that by our baptism we are set apart from all other nations as God’s children. “Having abolished circumcision, which was done with blood, Christ established in its place the sacrament of baptism. By it we are received into God’s church and set apart from all other people and alien religions, that we may wholly belong to him whose mark and sign we bear. Baptism also witnesses to us that God, being our gracious Father, will be our God forever…It washes and cleanses it from its sins and transforms us from being the children of wrath into the children of God.”[14]
VI. Familial Relations – Synodical Statements
During theculmination of the Civil Rights struggle in the United States, Synod declared concerning interracial marriage, “Holy Scripture does not give a judgment about racially mixed marriages; contracting a marriage is primarily a personal and family concern. Church and state should refrain from prohibiting racially mixed marriages because they have no right to limit the free choice of a marriage partner.”[15]
Synod recognized that Christ’s redemptive work made the church one, without distinctions that require separation. “For a true understanding of the rights, equality, and we should see all men not only as creatures of God, made in His image, but also as those who have sinned, and need redemption. Therefore in our relation to fellow believers we should recognize the new unity which all Christians, regardless of race, have by virtue of being redeemed by Christ.”[16]
VII. Societal Segregation – Kinist Claims
Kinists advocate separation of people from different ethnic backgrounds when it comes to marriage. Unfortunately, they also extend the supposed requirement of racial separation to every sphere of life including in the church and state. Kinists would use the force of the state to establish racial boundaries as was done in the American South during segregation and South Africa during their policy of Apartheid. The following statements from Kinists supporting segregation run contrary to the stated positions of the CRCNA:
“That sin is a universal deformity in human nature, and that no perfect society is possible this side of Heaven. That Christians should work to limit human error by seeking those conditions which are inherently productive of a harmony of interests, both in marriage and in society at large. That a harmony of interests naturally exists between people who are similar.”[17]
“That man, as a creature, is necessarily limited. That because he is limited, his responsibility to others is also limited. That human responsibility is Biblically regulated by relationship, such that we have a greater responsibility to our own family, race, town, state, region, and country, than we do to “the other”. That Christians should favor the native and the normal over the alien and the novel.”[18]
“We affirm the multi-national multi-racial makeup of Christ’s Church. We further affirm that the nations and races are themselves individual expressions of Providence, separated and cultivated by God to check the spread of evil and add to His glory, to be preserved kind after kind in this world and eternally in the world to come. We affirm that all attempts to amalgamate humans into one mixed mass are in open rebellion against God’s law and His sovereignly created boundaries.”[19]
“Our grandfathers called those advocating for diversity and integration “infidels” who had abandoned the Bible for “modernism” and were (sp) leading the Christian flock astray.”[20]
“God is the author of segregation and racial separation. Our grandfathers rightly believed that those who rebelled against racial separation rebelled against God Himself, the Author of those boundaries.”[21]
“That the ideal Christian social order is an extension of the family concept, considered at a larger scale. That Biblically, a nation is a large group of people of common patrilineal descent, living in a common geographical location, and having a shared religion, history, language, and civil government (a religio-ethnostate).”[22]
VIII. Societal Segregation – Scriptural Problems
Kinism routinely underestimates the importance of the church. They state, “…responsibility is Biblically regulated by relationship, such that we have a greater responsibility to our own family, race, town, state, region, and country, than we do to “the other””.[23]Completely missing from this statement is the church. Family, as defined by blood relation, takes priority over family as defined by the Spirit of God who makes all Christians brothers and sisters.
The CRCNA rightly views the role of the church in evangelism through the lens of the Great Commission. “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”[24]
After his death and resurrection, our Lord told his disciples, ““But[25]you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”
Jesus sent his ethnically Jewish disciples into the broad gentile world with the good news. By the power of the Holy Spirit, the church was dispersed throughout the world to minister to all nations. Kinists might respond that Jesus command maintains national distinctions. After all, he didn’t say, “Go, make all nations one.” While he does not explicitly state in this text that all nations are to become one, the Holy Spirit in other inspired texts noted above does that very thing. In Christ, we are one people.
The Holy Spirit empowered God’s people for their ministry to all nations.
“Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken. 7 Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? 9 Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, d 10 Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11 (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs—we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!”[26]
The Holy Spirit empowered the disciples then sent them out to fulfill Jesus’ prophecy that they would be his witnesses in Judea and Samaria. “On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria.”[27]
The Lord push Phillip directly into cross-cultural ministry. “26 Now an angel of the Lord said to Philip, “Go south to the road—the desert road—that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.” 27 So he started out, and on his way he met an Ethiopian t eunuch, an important official in charge of all the treasury of the Kandake (which means “queen of the Ethiopians”). This man had gone to Jerusalem to worship, 28 and on his way home was sitting in his chariot reading the Book of Isaiah the prophet. 29 The Spirit told Philip, “Go to that chariot and stay near it.”30 Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. “Do you understand what you are reading?” Philip asked. 31 “How can I,” he said, “unless someone explains it to me?” So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.”[28]
Philip, a Jew, taught the Ethiopian how to read the Scriptures. Philip shared the good news with the Ethiopian and then baptized him.
Nowhere in Scripture do we find even the implicit teaching that people from one ethnic group should be wary of evangelizing people in another ethnic group. Even more importantly, we find nowhere in Scripture even the implicit command that Christians should set up separate ethno-states.
What we do find in Scripture is Jesus’ explicit command to engage in missions to the entire world, the Holy Spirit empowering missionaries and changing the hearts of people through the preaching of the gospel, without regard for ethnic heritage. While wisdom dictates that evangelism should be done in culturally appropriate ways which maintain cultural practices that do not conflict with Christ’s teaching, the Scripture strongly rejects the idea that missions should only be done intra-culturally.
IX. Societal Segregation – Confessional Problems
Kinist statements run contrary to Scripture, our confessions, and the Contemporary Testimony which stress the unity of all believers.
“The Spirit gathers people from every tongue, tribe, and nation into the unity of the body of Christ. Anointed and sent by the Spirit, the church is thrust into the world, ambassadors of God’s peace, announcing forgiveness and reconciliation, proclaiming the good news of grace. Going before them and with them, the Spirit convinces the world of sin and pleads the cause of Christ. Men and women, impelled by the Spirit, go next door and far away into science and art, media and marketplace— every area of life, pointing to the reign of God with what they do and say.”[29]
Article 36 of the Belgic Confession describes the role of the civil government saying, “We believe that because of the depravity of the human race, our good God has ordained kings, princes, and civil officers. God wants the world to be governed by laws and policies so that human lawlessness may be restrained and that everything may be conducted in good order among human beings. For that purpose God has placed the sword in the hands of the government, to punish evil people and protect the good. And being called in this manner to contribute to the advancement of a society that is pleasing to God, the civil rulers have the task, subject to God’s law, of removing every obstacle to the preaching of the gospel and to every aspect of divine worship. They should do this while completely refraining from every tendency toward exercising absolute authority, and while functioning in the sphere entrusted to them, with the means belonging to them. They should do it in order that the Word of God may have free course; the kingdom of Jesus Christ may make progress; and every anti-Christian power may be resisted.”
The Belhar Confession reminds us that, “…Christ’s work of reconciliation is made manifest in the church as the community of believers who have been reconciled with God and with one another.” Reconciliation means the bringing together of different groups into unity. The Belhar continues, “…that this unity must become visible so that the world may believe that separation, enmity and hatred between people and groups is sin which Christ has already conquered, and accordingly that anything which threatens this unity may have no place in the church and must be resisted.” A necessary result if unity in the church means a rejection any doctrine which:
- which absolutizes either natural diversity or the sinful separation of people in such a way that this absolutization hinders or breaks the visible and active unity of the church, or even leads to the establishment of a separate church formation;
- which professes that this spiritual unity is truly being maintained in the bond of peace while believers of the same confession are in effect alienated from one another for the sake of diversity and in despair of reconciliation;
- which denies that a refusal earnestly to pursue this visible unity as a priceless gift is sin;
- which explicitly or implicitly maintains that descent or any other human or social factor should be a consideration in determining membership of the church.[30]
HopeCommunity Church submits that the role of the church is to support political action that allows the free association of those within the church in accordance with our confessions. The role of the state is to protect our freedom to share the gospel with the entire world. Kinism would deny the church this freedom through the establishment of a religio-ethnostate resembling apartheid.
X. Societal Segregation – Synodical Statements
The CRCNAhas a well-documented history of dealing theologically with segregation. As a church founded by Dutch immigrants and connected to Dutch Reformed churches in South Africa during the state’s policy of Apartheid, the CRCNA strongly rejected the forced segregation of people based upon their ethnic background. We are deeply indebted to the work of the CRCNA as they formulated a response to apartheid, which is simply Kinism made manifest.
Kinism and Apartheid are, at their core, an effort to divide the church of Jesus Christ. The CRCNA delineated how the church is to be both diverse and unified in “God’s Diverse and Unified Family” which states:
“The church, Christ’s gathered body in the world, is the means by which God intends to reveal himself, to proclaim the good news, and to unite all things in Christ.
In John 17, Jesus is more precise as to how the church reveals God. Jesus prays that all the people who believe in him “may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you” (John 17:20–21). Why does he want them to be one? “May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. . . May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me” (John 17:21, 23). When the church is one, people see God. The power of the church’s witness lies precisely in its new oneness in Christ, a oneness of believers that transcends external differences.
The church will be effective in the mission God has given it only when it understands and lives out of a vision that appreciates both its unity and diversity in Christ. The church is one in Christ (1 Cor. 1:10–17; 12:12–13). Christ is the one foundation of the church (1 Cor. 3:11) and the one head of the body (Eph. 1:22–23). “There is one body and one Spirit just as you were called to one hope when you were called—one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all” (Eph. 4:4–6). The church, however, is also marvelously diverse. Just as the body has feet and hands and eyes and ears and is incomplete without all those parts, so the body of Christ is made up of many parts. In 1 Corinthians 12, Paul teaches that each part of the body is necessary to make the body function with complete effectiveness, and all parts have equal dignity, regardless of size or function. The gifts of the Spirit to the church are marvelously diverse (1 Cor. 12:27–31; Eph. 4:11–13; Rom. 12:3–8).
This teaching on the unity and diversity of the church is extremely important as we think about matters of racial and ethnic diversity in the church. On the one hand, Scripture calls us to be one in Christ. This is not just some theoretical oneness. It is a visible, actual unity of people with one another because they share in the common source of life—Jesus Christ. This unity is so real that the world comes to know God through it (John 17:23). This scriptural call to unity judges the church in its lack of unity.
Nevertheless, unity does not obliterate differences. To be whole, the body needs each part. In terms of racial and ethnic differences, the goal in the church is not to rub out those differences and try to make everyone the same. Each of us has a particular race, ethnicity, and culture. We do not cease to be Korean or Kenyan or American when we become part of the body. Rather, each particular person (and community) plays a part in making the body whole. Each person and community brings unique gifts and makes unique contributions. In the Spirit, diversity is no longer threatening; it is enriching. Unity and diversity together confirm that indeed the church is the Lord’s work, not our own.”[31]
Working out the unity through diversity calls the church:
1. To pray and work for the increased enfolding of ethnic-minority persons into the CRCNA in order to reflect more fully the racial and ethnic diversity of Canada and the United States.
2. To ensure the equitable representation and meaningful participation of ethnic-minority persons in leadership and other roles of influence at all levels of denominational life.”[32]Which is antithetical to Kinism.
Synod stated in 1983, “Synod is deeply grieved and disturbed over the unbiblical ideology and persistent practice of apartheid/separate development in the society of South Africa and within and white Reformed churches and the consequences these have, such as is evidenced by the fact that there are separate churches for believers of different races so that even at the table of the Lord racial separation is maintained.”[33]
Synod continued in 1984, “It is the judgment of the synod that-where citizenship (with the full rights and privileges of membership) in a territorial state is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality (ethnic identity);
-where membership (with the full rights and privileges of membership) in a congregation of the church of Jesus Christ is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality;
-where participation in the Lord’s Supper is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality;
-where free and untrammeled participation in the economic life of a community is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality;
-where unrestricted participation in the public educational system of a society (or political entity) is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality;
-where unrestricted participation in social units (marriage/family, political parties, service or cultural associations, labor organizations, athletic organizations, etc.) or social functions (weddings, funerals, recreational or cultural gatherings, etc.) or public facilities (medical, travel, entertainment, athletic, recreational, service, etc.) is allowed or disallowed on the basis of race or nationality;
-or where the according to any human being of the official status of a: person with full dignity, rights, and privileges is conditional upon his/her having been assigned by authority a specific racial or national identity: there race and/or national identity have been made an absolute that fundamentally conditions and qualifies the common humanity of all human persons (as absolute, if not more so, than the created distinction of male and female). As a result, the state, which under God is appointed the guardian of the rights and privileges of every human being and the defender of ‘justice, becomes a power structure enforcing a false ideology and administering systematic injustice. As a result, also, the church, which in Christ has been made and called to be the one, new reconciled humanity, denies its confession of unity in Christ (one, holy, catholic church) and repudiates its calling to live together as the one body of Christ that acknowledges only the distinctions of spiritual gifts.
Where such an ideology is the guiding principle for the systematic policies of the state and where the evil of such an ideology, with all its sinful consequences, has been clearly and persistently exposed: from within the church itself and where the ‘church(es) nevertheless continue to support and/or do not oppose such an ideology and its resultant injustices, and where they reflect that same ideology in their own life and structure, a status confessionis concerning this matter must surely (though :humbly and with anguish) be acknowledged.
Any church that supports or warrants such an ideology in the name of the Word of God is untrue to the Word of God, and the teachings it propounds in support or defense of such ideology must be judged heretical. And any church that does not vigorously oppose such an ideology must be judged guilty of disobedience to God’s Word and to Christ its Lord.”[34]
We, as a denomination, understood that we could not be associated with such an evil practice given the theological and ethnic similarities between South African supporters of Apartheid and the CRCNA. Likewise, we should be equally forceful in our denunciation of Kinism as it is rooted in the Reformed tradition.
The CRC has recognized the church and state’s role in race relations is not to facilitate segregation, but to allow Christians to freely associate with other Christians in love regardless of race. “Believers should be equipped by the church through teaching and discipline to serve God, in all spheres of society, individually, and where possible, corporately. Believers must also proclaim the commandment of love in race relations and make it applicable to the affairs of civil government and the structures of society.”[35] Kinist’s desire to establish an ethno-state runs contrary to the CRCNA’s stated goal of proclaiming the commandment of love in race relations in civil government.
Synod clearly expressed that interracial worship is a starting point for living lives with people of different ethnic backgrounds when possible. “The unity of the Body of Christ should come to expression in common worship, including Holy Communion, among Christians regardless of race. It may be that linguistic or cultural differences make the formation of separate congregations, often with their own type of preaching and worship, advisable: in these cases it is wise not to force an outward and therefore artificial form of unity but to recognize the differentiation within the circle of God’s people. However, the worshipping together of people of different races, is a sign of the deepest unity of the church, and can be an example for the life of society as a whole.”[36]
XI. Overture
HopeCommunity Church overtures Classis CA South to overture synod to do the following:
- Declare that Kinist teaching constitutes a serious deviation from sound doctrine.
- Declare that any officebearer who teaches or promotes Kinist theology is worthy of special discipline in accordance with Article 83 of the church order.
- That Synod 2019 acknowledge, with lament, the historic and present use of our beloved Reformed theological tradition to perpetuate hateful racial prejudice and the theological error of Kinism.
- That Synod 2019 instruct the executive director to create, through the appropriate agencies, education, instruction, and discussion opportunities for church leaders and lay members to recognize and refute the heresies of Kinism and white nationalism in various social contexts where we may encounter it.
Grounds:
- We believe God has called the Christian Reformed Church of North America to minister to the entire world.
- We believe Kinism in the CRCNA is contrary to our stated vision to be, “…a diverse family of healthy congregations, assemblies, and ministries expressing the good news of God’s kingdom that transforms lives and communities worldwide.”
- We believe tolerating Kinist theology and worldview in the policy, clergy, or office bearers of the CRCNA communicates loudly that Christian Reformed Christians do not welcome people from ethnically diverse backgrounds in our ranks.
- We believe segregation based upon race is antithetical to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
- In 1968 Synod declared, “…that members of the Christian Reformed Church ought freely to receive as brethren, regardless of race or color, all who repent of their sins and who profess their faith in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord; that exclusion from full Christian fellowship on account of race or color is sinful; and that if members are judged responsible for such exclusion they must be dealt with according to the provisions of the Church Order regarding Admonition and Discipline.”
- We compromise our mission to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with our neighbors when we harbor the heresy of Kinism within our denomination.
[1]http://tribaltheocrat.com/2013/08/what-is-kinism/– Accessed 1/12/19
[2]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Col 3:1). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[3]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Col 3:7–10). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[4]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Col 3:11–12). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[5]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (1 Pe 2:9–10). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[6]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Eph 5:25–28). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[7]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Dt 7:1–4). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[8]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Ezr 9:1–4). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[9]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (Ezr 9:10–11). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[10]The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). (2 Co 6:14–18). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[11]Contemporary Testimony, Point 35
[12]Contemporary Testimony, Point 46
[13]Heidelberg Catechism Q&A 74
[14]Belgic Confession Article 34
[15]Acts of Synod 1969, page 51
[16]Acts of Synod 1969, page 50 and 51
[17]http://faithandheritage.com/about/ sourced 12/5/18
[18]http://faithandheritage.com/2013/08/what-is-kinism/
[19]http://faithandheritage.com/about/ sourced 12/5/18
[20]http://faithandheritage.com/2013/08/is-segregation-scriptural/ sourced 12/5/18
[21]http://faithandheritage.com/2013/08/is-segregation-scriptural/ sourced 12/5/18
[22]http://faithandheritage.com/2013/08/what-is-kinism/
[23]http://faithandheritage.com/2013/08/what-is-kinism/
[24]The New International Version. (2011). (Mt 28:18–20). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[25]The New International Version. (2011). (Ac 1:8). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[26]The New International Version. (2011). (Ac 2:5–11). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[27]The New International Version. (2011). (Ac 8:1). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[28]The New International Version. (2011). (Ac 8:26–31). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
[29]Contemporary Testimony, Point 30
[30]Belhar Confession, Article 2
[31]God’s Diverse Family, pages 22-23
[32]God’s Diverse Family, page 29
[33]Acts of Synod, 1983 page 712
[34]Acts of Synod, 1984 pages 603-604
[35]Acts of Synod, 1969 page 51
[36]Acts of Synod, 1969 page 51